Attention: these women are not plus sized.


Heads up Glamour- these women are NOT PLUS SIZES. They just aren’t. They are beautiful women, to be sure. I do not want to degrade them. But don’t be all ‘ohhh love your body whatever size it is’ and then only represent the same old skinny white girls that you usually do. That’s SO FUCKED UP!

There ARE actual fat women -stop using the word curvy. seriously- who read your magazine sometimes, like me, and your ‘exact shape’ things don’t address anyone’s needs. Is anyone JUST busty, or JUST apple shaped? JUST pear shaped? Here, let’s put your body into this little cookie-cutter box and call it diversity, call it size acceptance. As a side note, there are plenty of plus-size models who go up beyond a size 12 so don’t use the ‘there’s a shortage of models’ excuse. Bullshit. Size 12 IS NOT PLUS SIZE!

You can’t get around that! Just can’t! Want to accurately represent plus-sizers? How about a size 24? 28? The actual fat ones.

Instead, you’re being counterproductive with this cover. Why? Fat Acceptance, what we are doing, is NOT popular among American women. Most, no matter what size they are, think that they are fat. So when you put ‘size 12′ on your cover next to a few size 8s in a bikini, the women who wear a size twelve are thinking, ‘I don’t look like that in a bikini. Hell, I don’t look that good at all.’

And they continue comparing THEIR body to these three bikini clad white girls. (Wouldn’t hurt ya to do some racial diversity, either.) I know, I know, here I am expecting a fashion magazine to cater to fat people? Nah. Not just any fashion magazine. This one has had the whole ‘love your body’ thing going for a while now. Although, I will admit, when they interviewed America Ferrera as the representation of curvy(read:fat) women in Hollywood, I was smiling when America was like…’Umm..I’m a size seven.’

She used to be beautifully fat (she still is beautiful, but I preferred her when she was fat.) But this magazine is putting itself out there when it talks about accepting your body. It appears, however, that the only bodies anyone in Glamour is really talking about accepting, are the one that look like the women on the cover. And that isn’t size acceptance.

this is a fat woman. who is cover-model material. PLENTY of other girls like her.

NOT a fat woman. She's a 'plus-size' model because the fashion industry is effed up but she is not a fat woman.

14 thoughts on “Attention: these women are not plus sized.

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention http://icedteaandlemoncake.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/208/ -- Topsy.com

  2. Nance, I just love what you are doing here! I agree with you completely!! Keep spreading the word. People need to know!

  3. Pingback: It’s nice to share | definatalie.com

  4. Woah. Not only is Crystal Renn not fat (although I love her!) but um, that cover photo of her is photoshopped ALL TO HELL. and from the image I saw at pluseyes’ tumblr, the other images are too. Renn is not fat, no, but she’s not quite that thin either!

  5. I agree with you to a point, but at what weight/height/size/appearance is a woman allowed to identify as “fat”?

    As for plus sized, maybe she isn’t any more, but if you’ve read Chrystal Renn’s book, Hungry, you’d learn that she has been everywhere from a size 12 to a 16 during her career as a plus-size model. Whether or not the existence of a plus-size industry is fucked up in and of itself, I am pretty sure that it’s general knowledge that plus size clothing begins at a US 12. And I know plenty of women who identify as fat and wear a US size 16. It’s kind of invalidating to suggest they don’t also struggle just because they’re on the smaller end of the spectrum.

    Just sayin. I don’t identify as fat simply because I don’t want to step on anyone’s toes in situations such as this, but at a (usually) US 12, and maybe “atypical” proportions, I have a difficult time finding clothing and visiting the doctors office without a “fat” lecture too.

  6. I have a friend who measures in at 37,30, 39 – a US size 8-10, usually. And yet, I’ve been coming across more and more US website sites who say that those measurements are LARGE and some evening saying XLARGE or plus-sized?

    WTF?

    Since when is US size 10 plus sized?

    I’m a US16 and accept that I’m in that range, but size 10?

    No wonder people are so f*cked up about body image.

  7. Pingback: Can I brew hot tea with “Cold Brew” tea bags? | Tea

  8. You got a really useful blog. I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s